Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Alona Lebedieva: European Defense Summit – Important Signals, but Concrete Decisions Needed

On February 3, an informal summit of EU leaders was held in Brussels, dedicated to issues of defense and support for Ukraine. Among the participants were the heads of European states, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. The key topics of discussion were threats from Russia, increased defense spending, and the development of a European security strategy.

This meeting demonstrated that EU countries are aware of long-term security challenges and the need to strengthen their defense capabilities. This is a positive signal, since collective security and support for Ukraine are directly interrelated.

At the same time, there are no concrete decisions yet. “Discussions on increasing defense budgets are important, but delaying making concrete decisions plays into the Kremlin’s hands. Europe does not have the luxury of lengthy consultations when Russia is testing the unity of the West every day with military and hybrid methods,” says Alona Lebedieva, owner of the Ukrainian diversified industrial and investment group Aurum Group.

One of the key issues was the increase in defense spending above 2% of GDP. “At the same time, strengthening European defense should not be seen as an alternative to helping Ukraine. The Ukrainian army is now actually the only shield that protects all of Europe,” Lebedieva emphasizes. Any delays in decisions on military assistance, insufficient pace of arms deliveries, or ambiguous signals about future commitments only serve the Kremlin’s interests.

Waiting for the June European Council to make decisions is precious time that Ukraine cannot afford to lose.

Right now, Europe’s security for years to come is being determined. If the West wants to deter the aggressor, then statements about the “need to spend more” and “long-term commitments” must quickly be translated into concrete arms deliveries, financial support, and new sanctions,” says Alona Lebedieva.

Without real action, discussions about Europe’s “strategic autonomy” will remain just rhetoric. And for Ukraine, the West’s inaction could have critical consequences.